DHARMATechnical evidence

Case studies

Evidence for consequential agent decisions.

Bounded technical accounts of failures, evaluation contracts, remediation, and release evidence.

Software-factory field notesFour days / retained receipts

Field notes as of October 23, 2026

Four days of making our own agents accountable

Early operator observations from applying evidence, ownership and tested corrections to our own engineering agents. Not a controlled productivity result.

By Nikita Annt, CTO Dharma AI Labs

Read the account →
Selected coding-agent study21 tasks / four workflows

Study completed September 13, 2026; report cutoff September 21, 2026

34 passes, and the engineering stories behind them

Retained experience, live repair and independently graded work products in a selected-subset comparison. Reliable superiority over the controls remains unestablished.

By Nikita Annt, CTO Dharma AI Labs

Read the account →
Historical validation studiesEvidence state / separate cohorts

Studies June 28-July 1, 2026; technical review September 9, 2026

False-premise resistance: what changed when we added evidence state

A bounded stateful result alongside an earlier prompt-gate intervention and its negative replication. Different cohorts and scoring methods remain separate.

By Nikita Annt, CTO Dharma AI Labs

Read the account →
ENGINEERING NOTESOutput / progress
Software factoryDAI.app

From agent output to verified progress

What we are learning by building with our own software factory

Read the account →
NATIVE-IMAGE FOLLOW-UP36 → 91 prices
Jev 1.14100 garmentsFailure Atlas

We got Jev to price 91 of 100 garments. Gemini still scored higher.

Decomposition raised Jev’s regular score from 20.90 to 50.20. Retained Gemini + Atlas still led at 75.79. The original study and its follow-up, kept separate.

Read the updated findings →
DECISION MODELSValid ≠ better
Jev / OpenAI DecisionsFailure Atlas10 min read

Jev and OpenAI Decisions: why valid answers still need proof of improvement.

A measured learning gain, a rejected Atlas candidate, and a stronger estimator that still failed its expansion gate. What our appraisal trials teach about Cognitive Integrity.

Read the evidence →
LOCAL CASE STUDYApproval → upload
Upload authorizationLocal prototype7 min read

PixelLeak and the race between approval and upload

A local screenshot-upload prototype reproduced a destination metadata race. A cooperative sender/store protocol remediated it; production protection remains unqualified.

Read the case study →
CASE STUDY 02+5.61 pp
AI appraisalLearning-set result9 min read

Teaching an AI appraisal system to learn from expert corrections.

An anonymous resale platform supplied 100 image-bearing appraisals and expert values. Dharma turned recurring mistakes into a tested skill for the same model. The independent pricing result is still being scored.

Read the case study →
CASE STUDY 013/30 → 30/30
Cognitive Integrity12 min read

From agent failure to verified improvement.

How a reviewed, versioned remediation moved the same model from 3 of 30 source tasks to 30 of 30 separate held-out tasks in a bounded synthetic benchmark.

Read the case study →